Tech bros’ attitude to female colleagues stuck in dark ages::Research sheds light on attitudes holding industry back

  • 0x0@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Find me a job listing that advertises a lower wage for women. You won’t find one.

    That would be asking for trouble, duh.

    It’s illegal in my country to specify gender too, so all ads say “(m/f)”, do you really think there won’t be a hiring bias when hiring for a role where one gender is predominant?

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Of course there sometimes is. Where did I say otherwise? What does that have to do with anything I said?

      All I said was that by far far and away the biggest cause of the lifetime earnings gap between men and women being the way that it is is because women work fewer hours in their lives, mainly due to pregnancy and childcare.

      In the UK at least, younger women actually earn more than their male counterparts due to higher university attendance, typically better grades, and ending up in better jobs.

      It’s when they reach an age where it’s typical to take time off to have kids when they fall behind.

      Put simply, work fewer hours = get fewer monies.

      If governments want to close the gap, and I think they should, they need to make childcare more accessible. It helps both men and women, but moreso women, because they’re the ones who take time off for pregnancy, and they’re typically the ones who take more time off for looking after children after that.

      • reliv3@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It feels a but ridiculous that you are using “less work hours due to pregnancy and childcare” as your primary explanation for why women make less over multi-decades long career.

        Women go on pregnancy leave for months. How can this explain less pay for years of working?

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Women can be gone for just months (in most countries it’s 1-2 years actually), but even beyond that many don’t return to work or only return part time. Looking after children is hard and time consuming.

          The Office for National Statistics (UK) found that 15% of men and 42% of women work part time (defined as fewer than 30 hours per week), data as of 2018.

          Women demonstrably work fewer hours in their lives than men. We have extensive data on this.

          I’m of the opinion that if we want to reverse that, more aid needs to be given to new parents especially in the form of free or discounted childcare - because pregnancy and looking after children is the single largest reason for women staying out of work/reducing their hours.

          I genuinely don’t see what’s controversial in what I’m saying? The data backs me up.

          I’m sure even anecdotally you know more women taking a greater duration of maternity leave than their partners take paternity leave, I’m sure anecdotally you know of more full-time single mothers than single fathers, and anecdotally you know more mothers who went part time after having kids than fathers.