• Gigan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It made $2 billion but I don’t know anyone that saw it. Or if they did, they didn’t talk about it.

    • deus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I saw it. I enjoyed it a lot. Pandora’s seas look even more stunning than the forest did in the first movie. Loved meeting the Omatikaya clan and Jake’s new family (Spider and Kiri too, of course). Also, Quaritch being reborn as a Na’vi made him a much scarier and more interesting antagonist than he was. Can’t wait to see what Cameron has in store for us in the sequels.

    • angrymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I saw it, it was shit, specially because I remember the first. The plot of the 2 is horrible, even comparing with first that was generic.

      The story moves around the fact that humans want to get rid of blue ppl from a place to explore mineral resources, the leadr of the blues go away, instead of massacre the blue ppl they go for the leader in another place (???)

      And half of the movie is just kids doing shit to help the plot show the water, this movie was a long and slow torture.

      • 1simpletailer@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Holy shit do these movies need to edited down. Watched the latest one a few weeks ago and man was it 90 minutes of plot stretched into a 3 hour film. Felt like I was just watching James Cameron fellate himself on screen. Oh yeah Jimmy, such a beautiful and imaginative world. Shame it’s wasted on the blandest characters and most simplistic themes imaginable.

        • angrymouse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          I believe if was 80 minutes I would remember it as a good movie and a visual masterpiece, but now I remember as a slugg story that destroyed a technical achievement.

      • FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I watched it in 3D on mushrooms. It was one hell of an experience that way, but my god it felt like it lasted 10 hours

        • angrymouse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I saw 3D as well and It was undisputable beautiful, but half of the movie I didn’t see, I was rolling my eyes. I Just can’t accept how a movie so expensive was unable to create a plot aligned with the Idea of a visual masterpiece.

          • FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, my friend was over it as soon as he saw humans sent the same exact general who got his ass kicked the first time back to try to do the exact same thing. Obviously it can’t be 100% realistic but if there was any suspension of disbelief at all it could have been so much better

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If I remember correctly, Sarge (no idea wtf his name is) had a vendetta and the folks not in his direct circle of troops were hesitant to allow his pursuit of Jake.

        Don’t mistake this as some defense of perfect writing, it wasn’t my favorite or anything, but I do think that was talked about.

        • angrymouse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          But iirc the general also sent soldiers after Sarge (I also don’t remember his name) to kill Jake, it was not just the vendetta guy

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, like once Sarge convinced them they were on board but I could’ve sworn there was at least hesitancy. His argument was something like Jake is a symbol? Idk.

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah you don’t remember his name. Action and horror movies depend almost solely on the strength of the villain. So when no one can remember even the name of the villain what does it say about the movie?

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t remember characters’ names from movies I love either though. I’m very bad with people’s names as well.

              • JackbyDev@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Of course I do, I’m just saying it’s very common for me to forget. I loved Scream but I can only remember Tatum. Matthew Lillard I kept calling Shaggy. I recently saw Insidious again and I remember like, Elaine? And that’s it. My memory of characters’ names doesn’t seem to correlate very strongly with the quality of the movie.

      • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well if you only watch it on a small screen that makes sense. In Imax 3D it was stunning, and very engrossing.

          • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            And that’s a problem?

            I still enjoyed the story, but being so drawn in by the world is what certainly helped make it more enjoyable.

            • wombatula@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Once it leaves theatres, of course that is a problem lmao. Where can I go see it in imax 3d? Spend half a million dollars on a home cinema?

              I watch most movies at home, as do most people (especially since covid), if I can’t even buy tickets to the theme park then what interest is it to me?

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          The special effects were beautiful it was the plot that was the problem. Pretty much the same as the first one.

    • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I saw it in Imax and had a great time. I know several people who also saw it and loved it.

    • Magister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      As a lot of people I saw the first one in 3D IMAX surrounds DTS whatever. Once. Never watched it again. Never saw the second one.

    • WalrusDragonOnABike@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I heard many people mention it. I think mostly high schoolers (I work in education)? Probably the same people who watch anything that’s trending news. People I know who are actually old enough to see the original in theatres mostly seemed uninterested.