• anivia@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Or you could just get a Moto tag, which already supports Google FindMy and has centimeter accuracy thanks to UWB

      • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Bluetooth seems to propagate down the product line faster than UWB, so for people who wants budget devices but also have more accurate tracking functions, this might be better.

            • xthexder@l.sw0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              It’s not a joke. UWB adoption could easily stay ahead of Bluetooth 6 adoption. There’s nothing requiring phone manufacturers to always update to the latest Bluetooth, just like there’s still not very many 5G mmWave phones available.

              It could go either way. Bluetooth 6 might be more familiar for manufacturers to implement, but if the hardware is different to support the accuracy, who knows?

              • potustheplant@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                “easily”? Please, name one device that has UWB and doesn’t include bluetooth.

                Besides, if this is included in 6.0 and assuming it does cost much more per chip, where’s the harm in having a better feature set? This seems like an incredibly pointless discussion.