• pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    capitalism. next question?

    actually, don’t bother! just assume the answer to why things suck is always capitalism unless you find hard evidence to the contrary.

    • Nurgus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Planes are three times faster, five times longer range and 95% cheaper per mile, in real terms, than those early days.

      The consumer was given the choice and they chose this. Honestly, air travel is great.

      Yes, capitalism sucks. I hate being nickle and dimed for hand luggage, lottery tickets, snacks, hidden booking fees and all that shit. Some gentle regulations would be really nice, just to curb the excess.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        saying consumers were given a choice is a bit generous.

        also standing planes incoming.

        • Nurgus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          They were and still are given a choice. I can fly from London to New York on British Airways first class or Easyjet. Consumers consistently choose the cheapest headline price.

          • Crikeste@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            You can also buy a Ferrari over a Honda, doesn’t mean everyone can afford it making it not a choice at all.

            • Nurgus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Virtually no one could afford air travel prior to the 1960s, that’s a very large part of my point. It got affordable in the 70s and very affordable in the 80s.

              In the UK, at some point during the 80s, it became normal for almost every single working family to get on a plane and go somewhere sunny once a year for two weeks. Every year. Minimum.

    • psivchaz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Look, I’m basically a communist most of the time, but I don’t think this is a good take. I’ll admit I don’t actually know the numbers but I know air travel is expensive and not great for the planet.

      It could be better, sure, but I would argue that cramming people in and offering the barest of amenities is a good thing when it comes to air travel. Yes, it sucks to be in a plane but it sucks to pollute the air too. It’s good that more people have more travel options now, and it’s good that we can get more people to more places with less fuel than ever before. We shouldn’t bitch about that, we should accept it as a necessity for getting what we want: to arrive someplace far away in an amazingly short period of time, allowing us to see more of the planet than any of our ancestors, while minimizing the harm as much as we can.

    • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, generations of people hunting for a deal and these companies responding to demand with cheaper options. So capitalism maybe but more so human behavior.