• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I don’t see how anything they do can possibly affect what Chinese labs are doing. And that’s the only alternative to American labs right now. So, who are they going to convince exactly?

    • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 hour ago

      The point is to get laws passed in the US that create a moat for them as businesses. They don’t care about competing with China, they care about competing with the next YC cohort.

    • hirihit640@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It’s possible they are going to push the chinese labs to do the same. Doubtful it will happen. So they’ll go back developing AI and pretend nothing happened

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The problem for them could end up being that the economics simply don’t work. If more capable models are more power hungry, then operating them might be too expensive to justify. Or it could be that there are diminishing returns, and they simply can’t make a model that’s significantly better than the current frontier.

      • mofongo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I doubt the Chinese companies will comply, even if they agree on the surface. Whoever releases the most powerful model when the truce ends, will have the advantage. If anything, research and training will continue, releases will slow down.