• LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      16:10 has always been superior to both but I quite like my second 4:3 monitor. Also I was referring to mobile devices obviously (where most internet traffic comes from), and 4:3 isn’t a size measurement.

      • SharkAttak@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Uh… I don’t know if it sounded snarky, but mine was a joke. “If the extra space of 16:9 is going to be occupied by ads, better go back to 4:3 aspect ratio.”

        • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Oh I’m sorry, I didn’t get that. 16:9 doesn’t really add “extra space” to 4:3, it’s just a different ratio of the same exact space in terms of horizontal to vertical proportions. A monitor of a certain size will have the same diameter regardless of aspect ratio.