• jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      https://developers.yubico.com/Passkeys/Passkey_concepts/Discoverable_vs_non-discoverable_credentials.html

      While non-discoverable credentials are not considered passkeys, you should still be aware of them as there are still a number of valid scenarios where your application will need to support the use of them - especially as they are still valid WebAuthn credentials. These are credentials that cannot be generically invoked by a relying party. Instead a user will need to prompt the relying party with a username (user handle) to have the application provide a list of credential IDs to denote which credential(s) can be leveraged for authentication.

      Fido2 webauthn non-discoverable credentials are completely unlimited. Because the private key is on the yubikey directly. The only downside of this, is you have to type in your username first, but I think that’s an upside personally. I do not want anybody who compels disclosure of my hardware security key, to see all the accounts on it.

      • NaN@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Are your non-discoverable credentials also locked on the key, or can someone who knows your handle and possesses your key access your accounts? Online usernames are not well protected, I’d rather my key lock out after a few failed attempts to access it.

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          The non-discoverable keys cannot be removed from the device. The secret is non-transferable.

          In the yubikey bio series, this is implemented as a second factor. So you log in, and then present your hardware key as a second factor. You need your fingerprint, the key, your username. Fairly secure.

          I think this is a more secure model than pass keys as they’re being promoted today

          • NaN@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Yes, but do you need to unlock your key to use it? Possession is not enough to access discoverable credentials.

            You edited, but I don’t see this as significantly more secure than the Passkeys, and most keys are not the bio series (not that I trust fingerprint readers anyway).

              • NaN@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                In that case it does sound better, and many sites using passkeys still have you enter your username first anyway, at least at this point. I don’t know how Android implements it, I think iOS likely supports this use case and know that it also works as a second factor to a password through the same Passkey workflow. Unlike the Yubikey it always stores the key when you register though, even if it isn’t fully passwordless. Unfortunately what’s easy for the consumer will dominate.

                • jet@hackertalks.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I think the argument and the article is users just are going to avoid this whole confusing mess

                  And I would absolutely like the ability to use hardware key to log into multiple accounts on the same service.