You seem really intentioned on antagonising me for being someone that is not being contrarian. What is your last sentence even supposed to mean? “Cannot understand that people are here because they did not like Reddit”, really?
You are having a redditor moment by falling into shallow campism and name-calling instead of discussing a point critically.
It was in response to being called intentionally obtuse and “part of the problem” after pointing out that you were attacking me without making logical sense. Contrarian was a poor choice of words I admit, maybe hostile would’ve been more appropriate.
“called out” implies that I did something wrong. I was expressing an opinion and you called me obtuse without arguing why, then went to make that “if you cannot understand that people are here because they did not like Reddit then you are part of the problem” statement which I ironically find quite obtuse - I don’t think you honestly believed I don’t know/understand that users here don’t want it to be Reddit. Or what “problem” exactly I’m supposed to be a part of.
You just decided to see an enemy in me for some reason, and that’s what I meant for contrarian/hostile.
If you are going to ignore my problem with you then that’s on you. But I very much didn’t “decide to see an enemy”. You are clearly taking this way to seriously.
I am not ignoring it, you are not explaining what exactly this problem is. I guess just disagreeing? Or did you really believe my comment was obtuse and that I’m either unintelligent or arguing in bad faith? Btw you’re right, we’re starting to get a bit too deep in the comments, but I do love the irony of someone complaining about reddit and then bringing here the same bad discussions and behaviours.
You seem really intentioned on antagonising me for being someone that is not being contrarian. What is your last sentence even supposed to mean? “Cannot understand that people are here because they did not like Reddit”, really?
You are having a redditor moment by falling into shallow campism and name-calling instead of discussing a point critically.
I didn’t even reply to you, you replied to me… You are literally the antagonist here.
It was in response to being called intentionally obtuse and “part of the problem” after pointing out that you were attacking me without making logical sense. Contrarian was a poor choice of words I admit, maybe hostile would’ve been more appropriate.
Nothing I have said is hostile just because you don’t like being called out.
“called out” implies that I did something wrong. I was expressing an opinion and you called me obtuse without arguing why, then went to make that “if you cannot understand that people are here because they did not like Reddit then you are part of the problem” statement which I ironically find quite obtuse - I don’t think you honestly believed I don’t know/understand that users here don’t want it to be Reddit. Or what “problem” exactly I’m supposed to be a part of.
You just decided to see an enemy in me for some reason, and that’s what I meant for contrarian/hostile.
If you are going to ignore my problem with you then that’s on you. But I very much didn’t “decide to see an enemy”. You are clearly taking this way to seriously.
I am not ignoring it, you are not explaining what exactly this problem is. I guess just disagreeing? Or did you really believe my comment was obtuse and that I’m either unintelligent or arguing in bad faith? Btw you’re right, we’re starting to get a bit too deep in the comments, but I do love the irony of someone complaining about reddit and then bringing here the same bad discussions and behaviours.
If the sentence “Lemmy does not need to be a copy of Reddit” is to complicated for you then I am done trying to explain.