• 2 Posts
  • 352 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 6th, 2023

help-circle

  • Could you maybe elaborate on the feature parity?

    1. I travel often. There are a lot of devices in hotels, bnbs, and friend’s houses that have native plex support. Not so much for jellyfin.
    2. Casting to cast-compatible devices is very hit-or-miss, but mostly miss. I know the casting ecosystem is already a mess, but as far as user experience goes, Plex has spent more effort ironing it out.
    3. The native Plex client works with a controller on my bazzite HTPC when launched from the steam ui, while the native jellyfin client doesn’t.

    I keep trying jellyfin out every few months, but so far keep hitting enough friction that I can’t reliably make the switch.

    as in separate jellyfin account per each different jellyfin server?

    Yes, if me and 5 of my friends have jellyfin servers, we all need accounts on each other’s servers. I then need to juggle accounts to access their content.

    Jellyswarrm is a reverse proxy plugin I could run to mask the problem for myself, but it’s not a solution for mom who may have access to my server, and one other friend’s server that I don’t know.

    The correct solution is federated accounts, but the devs have already stated that they don’t want to do that.

    Why would you host it openly rather than in a VPN like Tailscale or whatever wire guard is?

    Then friends and family have to be on my VPN to stream anything.


  • To me this means they know they don’t have a viable business model. It’s possible they took on a lot of debt years ago, and now they have to enshittify to pay it back. I paid for the lifetime membership years ago, and I would say I’ve more than gotten my money’s worth and I’m mostly still happy with Plex, but I would drop them in a heartbeat if jellyfin was a viable alternative.

    People don’t like to admit it, but jellyfin doesn’t have feature parity yet. I think they could solve a lot of the issues if they went the federation route, but until then, it’s just easier for my family and friends to each have 1 plex account instead of N jellyfin accounts. Not to mention the jellyfin vulnerabilities that prevent me from considering hosting it openly.








  • teawrecks@sopuli.xyztoGames@lemmy.worldRDR2 is making me feel extremely sad
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    Idk if you’ve played the game, but you regularly have to deal with pretty harsh realities of those times.

    OP isn’t wrong, though. RDR2 does a good job of putting you in the shoes of someone 125y ago (as much as a real time simulation projected on a 2D surface can), after all, someone 125y ago wasn’t thinking “man, these times sure have some harsh realities”, it was just the world they knew.

    While I don’t think the writers intended the takeaway to be “look how much better life was in the wild west”, they did intend to give some perspective on what “freedom” meant to people in the US 125y ago. And how something things have changed while others have stayed exactly the same.


  • teawrecks@sopuli.xyztoGames@lemmy.worldRDR2 is making me feel extremely sad
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    Yes, this was the main theme of the game. To Arthur and the rest of their camp, they are the embodiment of the American dream: living off the land, doing whatever they want, working hard to succeed, living a simple life. They see “civilization” and the justice system that comes with it as a false promise, taking freedoms away to somehow guarantee more freedom. And they see the industrial revolution as creating the largest gangs of them all, but calling them “corporations”. So big that they can pay pinkertons to bully workers, while also paying the law to look the other way.

    RDR2 really is a work of art. It’s not 100% historically accurate, it’s “the lie that makes us see the truth”.




  • Who is “we”? I’m responding to your top level comment. You just asked the creator of an exclusively client-side app whether they support encryption. Not only is it reasonable for me to assume you mean client side encryption, it’s unreasonable for you to ask for server side encryption, because there is no server. It’s a BYOBackend situation.

    Now if you’re asking for client-side encryption, something like Keepass where the file itself is encrypted, you have to use some form of auth to decrypt it on use, and you can store this file using whatever backend you want, that’s perfectly reasonable. I would still consider that encrypted at rest, but at least you could maybe separate encrypted reads from writes and limit the attack surface in the event of a breach.