They are also pushing the identity politics, so we are distracted fighting among ourselves instead of uniting against them

The 2nd version of this container should add purity percentage.

It’s basically distilled water, no?

Much better than Sedia gestatoria.

Looks like Diaz guy purposely moved down to fuck the guy behind him.

First of all, this is about being PoC not about having certain political view.

Or do you think there is a reason that people with different skin color vote certain way?

Second, if this was the community I encountered some time ago, then it was mere tagging so people couldn’t pretend to be someone who they aren’t. You still could post there without being black.

But anyway this was about political groups. I don’t see “leftists” subreddits requiring a purity check like I see on nearly every conservative subreddit.

You mean tag users and automatically block comments from users that weren’t approved?

This actually shows that they’re is work being done to use LLM on social media to pretend to be ordinary users and trying to sway opinion of the population.

This is currently the biggest danger of LLM, and the bill to prevent states from regulating it is to ensure they can continue using it

Reality has a “left bias”.

This is why all conservative subreddits have to curate who can post there because it easily shows that they are really a fringe group that don’t reflect the general population.

It has nice, pastel colors.

Turns out they have been using AI for decades.

They say that because they are selling it.

And yeah, my experience is the same. The most frustrating is when writing in a typed python, and it gives answers that are clearly incorrect, making up attributes that don’t even exist etc.

So it is hot, Mr Rogers and neighboring cop are cooling their feet. Can someone tell me why Mr Rogers is still wearing a sweater? Is he taking the name literally?

No need, he only played a cop on the show, his real occupation was singer, actor & lecturer.

This is why you always block ads and trackers. It never pays to worry about revenue of “poor sites”

Like this?

No he does not.

Actually the explanation is wrong.

not()

is actually

not ()

not is a keyword not a function.

Boolean of empty tuple is False and then not negates it.

I explained it better here:

https://lemm.ee/post/61594443/19783421

Are you sure?

I can’t test it now, but to me it looks like () is an empty tuple. Python behavior is that for logic operations empty set equals to false. Then we apply not to get True. Not having space between not operator and parentheses makes it look like it is a function.

Python, but this is actually defined and documented behavior.

Edit: to illustrate what I mean:

not() # True

this actually is not () (the lack of space makes it look like a function), () is a tuple, in python an empty collection returns False, this is to make checks simpler. You can type:

if my_list:
  do something

instead of

if len(my_list) > 0:
  do something

not negates it so you get True

str(not()) # 'True'

converts resulting bool type into a string representation

min(str(not())) # 'T'

This might feel odd, but that’s also documented. min() not only allows to compare two numbers like it is in most languages, but you can also provide a sequence of values and it will return the smallest one.

String is a sequence of letters.

Letters are comparable according to ASCII (so you can do sorting). In ASCII table capital letters are first, so the ‘T’ is the smallest value.

ord(min(str(not()))) # 84

this just converts ‘T’ to Unicode value which is 84

range(ord(min(str(not())))) # range(0, 84)

This creates a sequence of numbers from 0 to 83

sum(range(ord(min(str(not()))))) # 3486

This works like min() except adds up all the numbers in the sequence together, so in our case 0+1+2+3+…+83 = 3486

chr(sum(range(ord(min(str(not())))))) # 'ඞ'

reverse of ord(), converts Unicode value to a character.

40 years as OP says ;) also you need to go to sleep at the same time