Chad move would be to be the big spoon.

Hard to believe we built all those barns just for the owls.

Isn’t there someone you forgot to ask?

That flame is retarded.

To whoever downvoted me, flame retardent is a material that doesn’t burn.

More over, there are more than one type of “LOVE”

EROS: Lust.

PHILIA: frends.

STORGE: natural family love.

AGAPE: Selfless , unconditional love.

Ludus: playful flirty love.

Pragma: committed Long term love.

Philautia: self love (not masterbation)

And more that are not captured by the greeks extensive vocabulary.

When I said ‘I love Ice cream’ I was saying I EROS Ice cream not I AGAPE Ice cream, this is a problem

I told you for the last time I don’t need magenta for my child.

Why do I have to enter the back door I already entered the front door.

No! I don’t want a subscription one baby is all I’m having.

I ain’t about to raise no pussy cuck baby, my babies gonna be a real Man.

I read you Cristal clear.

You can still goon to them if you like.

K, but Russia already did that so too late.

You’ve been a bad plant.

If I know anything about women it’s that they don’t know how to enter a hole

He did date his cousin.

Had to drive an entire school bus off a cliff to get 47 agent’s following me, including agent 47.

How many data points you think that is something like 5,177? HAY chatGPT HOW MANY NUKES DOSE AMERICA HAVE?

…

What a wonderful coincidence.

I heard they have some good fucking food there, but it didn’t taste very good.

run,

RUN AS A MOTHA FCKN GANGSTA.

*pretentious

Allow me to re-word your sentence:

“We absolutely could have domesticated raptors.”

My group without any possible room for disagreement from a sain man, disagrees with you the outsider.

My group (the royal ‘We’ giving a sense of universal acceptance but the sentence above clearly disagrees creating an in/out group mentality and the illusion that you are the odd one out, placing me in the out group) without any possible room for disagreement from a sain man, disagrees with you the outsider (this last bit is interesting because it is not a sentence The layman would agree with, wether true or not, ergo the entire point was to place me as an outsider not to make a fact).

That is an adversarial comment looking to discredit me.

A more proper way to say that would be something like:

You could domesticate a velociraptor.

Or if you truly believe it to be so

We do actually have evidence that it is possible to domesticate velociraptors.

As far as it being an opinion you are technically correct, your intentions might not have been to communicate aggression, however your opinion in this case doesn’t fall in the equation. you are performing the act of communication, the information that I received is what matters, otherwise you have failed that goal.