Pro: can’t really go viral on the mastodons.
Con: can’t really go viral on the mastodons.
You can actually go through the motions for years and learn nothing if the software allows for it.
Trump: “ guise, you can open factories in the US…”
The World: “don’t make eye contact with the crazy person”
Let’s see how ladybird writes docs in the future. Will they assume the user is a man and shut down any corrections for being political?
Pay no attention to desktop dying as people lose awareness of personal computing and lock themselves into closed ecosystems.
Indeed. It’s a privilege to be able to stay inside your little circle and say “we don’t do politics” or “ no ideology here”.
Don’t think we should be scared of the word “political” or “ideology”.
Looks like a confused Swedish dude that when questioned about his use of English pronouns defaults to not wanting to get political. Is there more besides a misguided decision to avoid relevant political topics?
I think we should chastise people that insist on not getting political, but not necessarily boycott everything they do. Or at least we should apply the same moral demands to Mozilla, Apple, Microsoft or Google when choosing which browsers to support. Which of them is the least bad?
This is actually about having the power of one person in an office wiping out any internet domain from the country.
Sometimes you get your own grenade to take care of as a user.
True. Even in the case of windows, it wasn’t like that some years ago.
Not the same thing as purchasing an OS. Which you can do already, but there aren’t many options.
Ultimately it’s all open source, you can make your own distro. If something doesn’t work, fork it and fix it yourself. That’s the beauty of Linux, with all that’s good and bad about it.
I would love to be able to pay $100 for more great Linux distros.
I find people complaining about every distro. The thing is, every operating system sucks. The good thing about Linux is how that becomes your fault.
To be fair, they do look ugly in the sky.