We need IA full mirrors. This is too critical to leave to this one company.
We need IA full mirrors. This is too critical to leave to this one company.
100% agree. Who sells assisted full self driving anyway? Tesla’s is supervised which means it drives and the person behind the wheel is liable for its fuckups.
Did they change it again? It was FSD Beta, then Supervised, now you’re telling me it’s ASSISTED? Since that’s not in TFA…
It’s important to maintain a non-personal domain account for management in case there are issues with logging in and the domain email has a disruption. I read some horror stories on the other place about such Catch-22s.
My recollection is it was the “unveiling” before they built it and it was one person in a costume.
I’ve been using Mojeek lately and it looks like their advanced search can do some of that.
https://www.mojeek.com/advanced.html
Reminds me of early Google search.
We’re probably decades away from them countering with anything meaningful like that unless large swaths of people start doing it.
What about a thin e-ink layer plus led layer display that fits over the plate and would block the plate while displaying a digital plate over it? May need a few rounds of evolution there but might work
Computers work with 1s and 0s. We have decided as a society that certain combinations of those equate to being copywritable. This ruling seems to be saying the result of a calculation cannot be copywritable? Wouldn’t creative tools like movie editor or photoeditor disagree? So then is the ruling actually saying these specific values used in this instance are not copywritable, changing the health to 100 for e.g., because there is no human creativity in the result of that value?
So if a programmer used an original work of art to define the state of health in the actual code, and verified the value matches the 1s and 0s that represent that work of art (thus it only ever comes down to boolean check in the logic side, and the value of the variable is never set to something simple like 0 to 100, it was using a huge amount of RAM and a very slow comparator operator.
Yea, I went there.
I’m not explaining it properly. Imagine instead of 100 hp, there is apple bananas. That isn’t really a mathematic representation in the same way that the cheat code can change. It would be a copyrighted work of art. It wouldn’t be trivial to build an hp system to do this (in fact it would be a large undertaking), but I am not asking about practicality, just what the law would find.
I mean what if you didn’t use 20/100 for the value, you used a symbol (in the code as the value). Would it still apply?
What if the health values are human creations like special symbols or works of creative art?
What is the tmpfs for?
Hoping for Deckard with this.
Sounds like you just invented Roblox.
Probably the “but”. I agree that both are exploitive and they should all be called out on it.
But what about…? Doesn’t excuse the first thing!
One other good method for secure distribution is supposed to be IPFS.
It sounds like a Dockerfile for your system OS?
That is an insane amount of storage. How much does it grow every year and is it stable growth or accelerating?