Slavery (vs using a machine), involves the subject being either a human, or more broadly, a sentient being with a sense of self.

An AI cam be intelligent without being sentient or having a sense of self.

Again, there’s no reason to think that intelligence is a linear scale or a binary property.

deleted by creator

And how does the human brain work?

Anything an LLM can do can be reduced to a list of instructions for a person to carry out based exclusively on the contents of a book full of word associations. You tell me what size the book becomes intelligent.

And you know that your brain works differently how?

At what point will you try to liberate the AI? 3/5ths human? Either you believe there’s a thinking thing being forced to create child abuse material or you don’t.

Why do you think that intelligence of any kind is that linear or simple, let alone artificially built ones?

It = literally a dictionary right

It’s literally mathematically not a dictionary.

Said “threat” is literally AI marketing PR. You are doing their job for them by being afraid

And you know this because you’ve personally used and tested current AI models?

The posted headline is literally “Texas become leading ground for testing small modular reactors”.

That inherently implies that places that aren’t Texas, are not becoming leading grounds for testing small modular reactors, bringing those other places into the discussion.

Right now that’s not the headline I’m seeing on the article though, so either they’re A/B testing headlines or OP editorialized.

Except there is no language. It’s just the appearance of one. You could replicate the language with a large enough dictionary and a set of instructions that some person follows.

You’re saying that because it can learn any arbitrary language, it’s incapable of learning languages?

I don’t get how anyone who isn’t an AI CEO rushes to dehumanize real living people in service of an unthinking, unfeeling machine.

It’s not dehumanizing, it’s realistically facing the threat head on.

AI doesn’t have to be fully human to take all knowledge jobs, it just has to be more intelligent then the average person in their domain. And it doesn’t have to be flawlessly more intelligent if it’s faster than them. Quantum computers have inherent randomness in their outputs, but they are still useful because they are so much faster at solving certain kinds of problems that you can run them 100x and discard the outlying results (a process known as error correction). AI agents that can duplicate themselves as many times as they want fall into the same category.

I’m so fucking sick of this “AI is just math it can’t be intelligent” take.

Literally everything we know about human intelligence, especially as compared to animal intelligence, suggests that language is one of the key fundamental differentiators between us and them.

Now we’ve built a collection of simulated neurons, at a scale close to that of the human brain, and trained it on the entirety of the human language, and people insists that there’s no way that could possibly exhibit any kind of intelligence.

If that’s your level of reasoning capability you’re not much better at it then an LLM.

Lol, typical American centric article.

Just outside Toronto, they’re building four 300MW small modular reactors, at an existing nuclear plant, using proven designs from Hitachi, and the first one is targeted to come online by 2029 or 2030, eclipsing the Texas projects in scale, timeline, and practicality, but that literally doesn’t even get a passing mention.

Still waiting for a source that’s not “vibes”.

Lmfao, who am I kidding I’m done.

Cite a source dumbass.

Cite your source dumbass.

Cite your source dumbass.

Lol Digital Foundry doesn’t, for some reason I trust them more then your social media damaged brain

Lmfao, bruh, you’re comparing looking at the sky and seeing what colour it is, to wasting your time on social media watching random outrage posts about video games like everyone sees the same rage bait that you do.

Go outside and touch grass, then cite your source dumbass.

Cite your source dumbass.

You don’t need to be remotely close to the most profitable tech company per employee to do that.

Or maybe you haven’t noticed how every game that’s made with Unreal Engine, all the way back since UE4, requires far more resources than is necessary to run what it’s running.

We’ll all wait for you to cite your source on that one, because, no Unreal does not perform particularly worse then any other game engine.

Unreal is broadly available and not just hidden behind AAA walls so a lot of A and AA devs won’t have time to optimize their games with it, but they wouldn’t have had time to optimize regardless of whether they published with Unity or Godot or any other engine. Unreal is certainly a vastly more efficient engine then Unity, which is its main competition.

Also, how are you squaring away the idea that Unreal is ruining games as art? There are two options:

1. be a creative game designer and spend all your resources on engineers to build you a custom game engine, then spend more resources training everyone at your company on how your specific niche engine works

2. be a creative game designer and use an off the shelf engine like Unreal to run and render your game so you can spend your resources on artists, writers, and designers, and everyone comes in knowing how to use it

Do you really think that number 1 leads to more artistic games? The literal entire reason we’re in an indie game mecca right now is because of the widespread proliferation of third party game engines, that let small dev teams focus on the game and not the engine.

Lmfao, you’re so brain dead that you think Unreal Engine is a bad thing.

Jesus fucking Christ learn how to think critically and not just suck Gabe’s billionaire dick.

Well Gabe is too busy having every gamer gargle his billionaire monopoly loving chode.

“Please Mr Valve, spit in my mouth and keep overcharging me. I want you to own more yachts.”