Creating stability for ourselves and loved ones really can be demanding and force us into positions that make impossible to be as ethical as we’d want to be.

That said it is crazy how many people in the “first world” view themselves in that category while the demands they have are “a room and bathroom per person in the household”, keeping the house 69 during the summer and 72 during the winter, a new 1000 dollar phone a year or two, a game system or two total a few k, a newer car because they’re last one is just over 80k miles, several subscriptions to constant instant entertainment, etc.

Like yes, there really are people that have to beg for more hours to keep a two bed room for themselves and their kids, those people don’t really have a choice. They are also the rest of us that really can just have a little less “treats” and be perfectly fine.

Do you have a case to cite for that? Not calling you out or anything but I want know who the hell ruled that and why. That’s insane

Idk they’re could have been workers who learned this was happening and put the cabosh on it too.

Prison time distributed by ownership at the time of crime.

Material science simulations, Weather and climate modeling, Protein and genetic analysis and modeling, Video games and CGI, Logistics and scheduling

As well for sure. Just the US also has factions trying to secure well paying union jobs as part of this. Both factions have had a voice towards protectionism but it wasn’t till it was war hawks trying to secure authoritarian (aka fascist) powers made moves did the needle really move.

People act like these series of events have pushed humanity forward. We are seeing the US, EU, and China all try to do as well as they were during the era of freer trade. Unfortunately for both China and the US the primary reasons for them pushing for this less then world is mostly desire to have their respective state dominate more people’s then they can now.

Slate and Mutaniy Motors are the only ones to give me a lil hope.

Otherwise it’s Edison Motors from Canada

Everyone else is stuck in the past or China looking to revolutionize the market with checks notes slavery and public investment.

Oddly infra wise one the best bets I’ve come up with is a crypto DAO running on GCP (they accept crypto). Totally p2p is clearly better than this for public data processing and distribution though, but when you need a to process anything securely,/confidentially it’s pretty lacking. Federation helps cover some gaps too.

Im glad they figured out the US was starting to develop a lead in life science and are going out of there way to hobble us. /s

Had to hunt for that cancel button myself what a pain

Rancher Desktop?

K3d?

Or something else?

Broken clock

More so his interests on this particular subject happen to align him better with the plurality of people

I agree there is no current law for it. It just feels like there should be some kind of obligation to ensure records are preserved. With heavy enforcement for mass operations of record destruction.

Destroying the an endangered book feels like it should be criminal no?

No no I just like seeing my work get used without any care or contribution back to create systems that absolutely don’t care about the rights of the users too /s

The right to bare AIrms

To me the invisble hand really shows off a really cool phenomon. It is pretty cool that with some agreed apon currencies and a market you really can get a scale of human coopetation not seen before in human history.

Calling it infallible is as stupid of “the divine right of kings” was even if feudalism was almost a remarkable improvement from war bands before (you know long stand multigenerational peace agreements and mechanisms to enforce bilatteral enforment).

The amount of times people failed to undetstand economics at this point should be shammed about.

Wealth isn’t a matter of deserving it. Any wealth earned by entertaining certain elites visions of what you ought to do is and always will be a function of those elites discretionary spending, and thus always at their discretion.

If you are trying to convince a group of people to give you their wealth in exchange for something, the something is almost always something that is comparitvily easier for you to provide but more importantly something that group needs or wants.

If you spend 3 decades earning certification that you know something, great. What does that give someone? Nothing. It is at best a signifier that you have a comparitive advantage, but is that true, do they people giving their wealth to you belive that? If no to either, its probally not worth it.

Etc etc etc

This isnt just capitalism btw. This is true in intetpersonal relatiinships, mutual aid groups, intertribal bartering, etc.

Hard disagree. Everyone should learn basic logic and how to do simple automations on the computer. It really is basic computer literacy. And conputers are a near and increasingly more so constant in every part of the economy.

Specialing in software engineering isnt needed, the same way everyone should basics about food and nutrition but not every needs to be a cheif.