That’s some barely legal weird. But make no mistake that, legal or not, it’s pretty fucking weird.
The end of the game for FF7.
Social norms dictate that I cannot support this post.
Exactly. Offbeat complainers can just not pass on their genes, right, wrong, or indifferent.
So make a funny face to this post and then feel entitled because Lemmy is a microcosm of the real world.


Unfortunately, the onus would be on you to prove it in court if the company doesn’t follow through. Nobody just shows up to call out a company for doing something that isn’t enforceable.
Word to the wise, this is an “easy” way around most HOA rules: you just gotta have lawyer money and time.
His hair is so angular…
Is that black Powerline?


All depends on your perspective I suppose. I didn’t ask to be messaged by you so I figure I’m absolved right?


Removed by mod
I was just yanking the other guy’s chain.
6? You were a year behind already! ;)


People these days couldnt even manually resolve an IRQ conflict!


A man of culture


The embedding layer post tokenization is not just a probability machine the way you’re suggesting it. You can argue that it is probabilistic with inferred sentiment, but too many people think it works like how text prediction on your phone does and that is just factually inaccurate.
Verify output of course, but saying “it doesn’t understand anything” and “probability machine” is a borderline erroneous short sell. At the level of tokens it “understands” relationships, and those relationships are not probabilistic, though they are fundamentally approximated based on a training corpus.


And at the same time I wouldn’t say “hey fuck that, duct tape is terrible! It doesn’t hold beams together, I can’t use it to tow a trailer, it’s all just pretending to stick paper together because really every sliver of duct tape just sticks to the previous piece, etc etc” But that’s the cool thing we do on Lemmy.
The ad is bad, duct tape ain’t bad.
Stack em. Go vertsack.


It’s just negligence. Power tools injure and people are stupid. The technology is alluring and people make dumb mistakes. There’s no deeper motive here, and self admitting you’re not even an amateur I will just tell you that you’re giving way less credit to these models than they deserve by calling them purely probabilistic, and way more credit then they deserve by trying to assert some kind of malicious incentive by anthropic.
These bastards are hard to make, and they have a lot of layers (not like NN layers, but training steps). They are, however, definitely better at programming than you or your buddy or any commentator here, and it lures you into a false sense of security before it makes a colossal fuck up.
On the grill?
Your tongue doesn’t quite fit between your teeth.