Ahhh the French champaigne…

plz xi

Does your vague snark have an actual point?

Regardless of what Wikipedia says about itself, it favors imperial core perspectives, firstly because English-language Wikipedia is dominated by editors of the Five Eyes states, but also because of its funders and leadership.

Meet Wikipedia’s Ayn Rand-loving founder and Wikimedia Foundation’s regime-change operative CEO

So did I, and then posted this comment so others wouldn’t have to.

Why are we assuming that everyone would know what “MAM” is or stands for?
https://www.myanonamouse.net/

I reject reality because reality is just parroting Russian talking points.
Ignore the evidence of your eyes and ears.

DeepSeek
You don’t have to put on the red light

Meh, she’s no Philomena Cunk.

A lifeline or ‘dystopian’?

Yes, and drop the scare quotes.

This is your LLM on drugs.

The recent attack didn’t have to do with cryptographic signatures. It was a supply chain worm, with GitHub Actions being the vector. https://snyk.io/blog/tanstack-npm-packages-compromised/

Stepan Bandera would never have outlawed antisemitism. Such a mensch he was!

ukrainian not being antisemitic challenge (impossible)

This guy punches left while modding “Pragmatic Leftist Theory” ([email protected]). In a surprise to no one, PJ posts there.

This is like basic trolly problem shit.

The trolley problem itself is shit.

I think the question is a very, to put it mildly, useless question. It’s a typical example of an analytic philosophical thought experiment, which is has basically nothing to do with real life. No one has ever been in a situation as it is described in the trolley problem.

That doesn’t mean that sometimes, unfortunately, we are in situations where we are where we experience a moral dilemma. Of course we’re often in a situation where we experience a form of moral dilemma. But moral dilemmas are always concrete, and you always experience them under specific conditions, in a specific context that is very complex. You have specific means to make the decision, and practically never are universal moral principles even helpful to make that decision.

As a matter of fact, moral principles are I would say empirically never really used to actually decide moral dilemmas. They are used after the fact to justify a decision, which is a typical form of moral communication.

If everyone knows—including you—that Russia isn’t socialist, why would you imply that it is?

I wouldn’t assume he believes what he says.