Pulaski doesn’t didn’t last long.

“Russian talking point“ isn’t an argument; it’s a thought-terminating cliché. If Russia says the sky is blue, that doesn’t make it green.

“Critical thought” is not how anyone learns what words mean.

You’re aware that everyone is aware of that, right? If you’re going to argue with a straw man, at least build a better straw man.

Ahhh the French champagne…

plz xi

Does your vague snark have an actual point?

Regardless of what Wikipedia says about itself, it favors imperial core perspectives, firstly because English-language Wikipedia is dominated by editors of the Five Eyes states, but also because of its funders and leadership.

Meet Wikipedia’s Ayn Rand-loving founder and Wikimedia Foundation’s regime-change operative CEO

So did I, and then posted this comment so others wouldn’t have to.

Why are we assuming that everyone would know what “MAM” is or stands for?
https://www.myanonamouse.net/

I reject reality because reality is just parroting Russian talking points.
Ignore the evidence of your eyes and ears.

DeepSeek
You don’t have to put on the red light

Meh, she’s no Philomena Cunk.

A lifeline or ‘dystopian’?

Yes, and drop the scare quotes.

This is your LLM on drugs.

The recent attack didn’t have to do with cryptographic signatures. It was a supply chain worm, with GitHub Actions being the vector. https://snyk.io/blog/tanstack-npm-packages-compromised/

Stepan Bandera would never have outlawed antisemitism. Such a mensch he was!