ObjectivityIncarnate

No one is actually worshiping him, it’s just a meme, relax.

Also this image is probably older than his being a billionaire, it has to do with Steam, not his net worth.

Brainstorming: maybe make it mandatory only when a review is about performance of the game, because that’s when it’s relevant. Maybe a checkbox as you’re writing a negative review that’s something like ‘what aspect(s) of the game don’t you like’, and if ‘performance’ is checked, a little addendum that says ‘your specs will be added to the review to give context’. In that case, people who want to look through reviews would also be able to filter by those same ‘types’ of reviews, or see what percentage of negative reviews are due to performance, or other things. Could be a good addition overall.

But generally, if someone wants to write a bad review because of shitty controls, or plot, or the game being too short for its price, etc., there’s no need to have specs attached to that kind of review.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but I think all the replies are misunderstanding you as saying ‘who has so much RAM’, when you’re actually referring to 30 being a bizarre total number of GB of RAM to have.

I can’t even think of a combo of (certainly-mismatched) sticks of RAM that’d get you to 30 even. 8-8-8-6?

few

Did you know there are well over 1,000 billionaires in the US? Have even 10 of them been implicated in the files, that you can name?

I’d say it’s more likely that a significant majority of them aren’t.

You’re welcome!

You’re going to enjoy this, I think (ignore the titles of the videos, this is definitely what @[email protected] was referring to, and the context makes the bit about WWW so much better:

https://youtu.be/Wo2KB1dEDdk
https://youtu.be/53hMYw8LX60

Getting the Orange Box for $10 back in the day has to be my all-time best.

So, was it deliberate for you to assign the ‘reddit stereotype’ to the exact opposite sentiment it’s actually associated with, or?

Two males have any sort of positive interaction with each other
Weirdos: Wow so GAY

Saying it in a positive way doesn’t really make it better. Normalize men being able to enjoy each other’s company without assuming they’re falling in love or lusting after each other, sheesh.

The classic analogy is the jar of 100 sweets.

Classic, but deeply flawed.

This is literally the same way white supremacists ‘justify’ being distrustful/suspicious of black people in general.

The mental stress that this level of paranoia inflicts on you is likely going to be more harmful on average.

You’re best off overall if you take reasonable precautions (having a small weapon/pepper spray), and just go about your day without stressing about it all the time.

Not to mention that rape by a stranger is literally the rarest type of rape, re relationship to the victim.

EDIT: It really is bizarre to see such simple, uncontroversial, and trivially-easily-verified facts downvoted so much.

Source?

What an idiotic article, from the headline down.

Locally replacing some letters with some other letters is going to make Microsoft’s CEO cry? Really?

Also, I’ll not be using Chrome, lol.

deleted by creator

When Firefox started recording key strokes

Source? That’s news to me, and when I tried finding a source myself, all I found were extensions etc. to add that to the browser.

EDIT: Both the comment I replied to, and a comment replying to me by the same person, have been deleted…were they caught in a lie/mistake and not brave enough to admit it? lol

Recently I’ve been seeing signs on them that kids can call Santa

That’s adorable :)

I remember the joke that Microsoft called it that deliberately so that if people wrote “I hate ME” it wouldn’t sound like they were trashing the OS.

You thought that because the headline is pretty deliberately misleading. Clickbait trash.

The article is clear the broken update effects a specific subset of enterprise users, on a specific mix of base versions and cumulative updates.

So you admit the headline is lying, then? The headline doesn’t even try to use weasel words to say “some users”, it just straight-up says that the update removes things, heavily implying both that it’s a global change, and that it’s deliberate.

you just get loans against your static wealth at incredibly favorable interest rates.

It’s more than that, because the wealth of those who utilize loans this way typically isn’t static. It’s not about just getting a good rate, it’s that the assets they use as collateral appreciate in value at a rate higher than inflation and the interest rate combined, so in practice, the interest rate is literally negative. The price of having access to these loans is that their net worth just grows a bit more slowly as a result.

Of course, this only works as long as said assets continue to appreciate at that rate.