Reminds me of Google’s thing with the Gemini name.

Google decides to use the Gemini name for their AI stuff either knowing other company has patent or whatever on that name when it comes to AI or just doing it anyway. Google asks Patent Office to give them the name, they are told no. Then some “mysterious third party” tries to buy out the other company. They figure it is Google trying to circumvent the patent, they stop contact and just sue Google.

I’m not sure if they decided on the name, saw it was taken and were like “yeah but we like the name so it’ll be fine” or if they’re genuinely stupid enough to first decide on the name and then they realize that oh shit

Sounds like a fun project

Trains from every factory to the end consumers might be a bit project

people eat birds

Dear god those devils lol

Business, ofc

Hard disagree, e-ink is fantastic for two thing, reading and battery life. Everything interactive, you’re better off with a tablet.

Comics are a form of reading

We both mentioned it separarely. And for a good reason imo, traditional books are a much better fit for e-readers because reflowing text just werks while comics are going to be a lot harder.

That’s the spirit

Highlighting, taking notes, comics all seem different from just reading

Aren’t most (sensible) data hoarders very organized? You want to save shit and be able to find it later lol

For weebs and such to read their comics

If you’re reading then colour doesn’t matter much. For comics I’d probably get a tablet.

deleted by creator

Potential in tech doesn’t mean the consequences are positive.

Why bother tell people who are complaining that what they’re complaining about is inevitable?

Because it’s just part of the discussion…? Friend, you might be taking discussion on Lemmy of all places a bit too seriously.

Kids do

You yourself said how it could replace all jobs and whatnot. If the tech was a dud then that wouldn’t happen. That’s the potential in it.

I think it’s fine to complain, nobody is stopping you lol. I was just saying that if it delivers on that potential then it’s going to be used no matter what. That’s just how it goes, even if it is upsetting.

It’s just that I really doubt anything can be really done about the advance of AI. Either it fizzles out or it actually delivers, and if it seems like it will deliver you won’t get people putting that genie back in the bottle. It’s just going to happen because there could be so much potential there, if it delivers.

It’s suspicious because you seems like you have a vested interest in AI or in making AI appear positive.

You seem to be framing AI as good for us normal folks, and that the only people at risk are those who do shitty work. That there is some kind of benefit for people to have and that the risk is so negligible that it’s fine.

You have a weird reading of my comments, no offense. I think you’re so upset at AI that anyone not being as hostile you take as positive and pro-AI. It happens, especially online, I wouldn’t worry about it too much, but it can just make discussion hard.

It’s not EU law unless it’s coming from the EU. If it comes from the member countries, it’d just be a national law.

Aren’t there a bunch of dress up and party holidays and such all over the world?

We have that during Easter

I don’t know if it’s that different from the real life luddites. Maybe the word has a different connotation in where you live, I don’t know, but I did mean it in a slight negative but mostly meaning “workers against the change”.

I think it might benefit society (as in I don’t know), but I don’t think I’ve ever been optimistic about that. I think things in general will keep getting worse.

I don’t know how I was saying the change is good or what was suspicious about what I said, I guess that’s more meta conversation but if you don’t mind I’d like to know