Merde!

Can we pick the nature of the upgrade? I want to pee champagne

Did you never go to high school? It’s not like this is a new phenomenon.

More salient takeaway is, don’t use a LLM to translate a scientific paper. Because it can’t translate a scientific paper. It can only rewrite the entire paper, in a different language. And it will introduce misunderstandings and hallucinations.

I’m not mocking, she was cool as hell.

It’s just…fuckin weird.

Remember when that dude blew up his cybertruck in front of Trump tower and everyone was like “oh it probably just did that” rofl

Duuuude why is the air force full of weebs

One of my coworkers was a female former air force mechanic and even SHE was a fuckin weeb

Right, and I assume that’s the vast majority of whatever women these guys are satisfying their fetishes with (aside from women paid for it).

But it’s still odd the fetish itself is so overwhelmingly male.

Has anyone ever met a woman who was really into having her toes sucked? It’s always dudes with this fetish

Literally EVERY SINGLE TIME a news article mentions both “porn” and “children”, it turns out it’s some bullshit being pushed by a Christian fundamentalist group, and often with an added dose of state surveillance and restricting liberty. Add in “terrorists”? Don’t even bother with this article, it’s pure hysteria propaganda. It’s like a WASPy suburban mom’s wet dream.

wasting more money on more contractors and giving them more of our data to store

…is the point.

Turns out in zero g people fart a lot. Not very sexy.

Doesn’t change the fact that FUCK THAT

Are there any places in Thailand that aren’t hot and humid? It’s a decent retirement option but I can’t stand that kind of weather.

And we have absolutely no data to suggest that’s happening. It’s purely hypothetical.

They’re being so caustic because they get a sick power rush from trying unleash a mob on someone. That’s all. They probably don’t give a shit about children.

Ok, but by that definition Google should be banned because their trawler isn’t guaranteed to not pick up CP.

In my opinion, if the technology involves casting a huge net, and then creating an abstracted product from what is caught in the net, with no steps in between seen by a human, then is it really causing any sort of actual harm?

Way to not answer the question.

It would probably make me distrust the prosecution, like if they’re bringing this up they must not have much to go on. Like every time a black man is shot by police they bring up that he smoked weed.

I guess my main complaint is that it’s insane to view it as equivalent to real CP, and it’s harmful to waste any resources prosecuting it.

This sounds like you’re searching really hard for a reason to justify banning it. Pretty tenuous “what if” there.

Like, a dildo could hypothetically be used to sexualize a child. Should we ban dildos?

It’s so vague it could apply to anything.