Like the fact that someone can get shot for offering to get their neighbour high, while companies can litteraly operate like crime syndicates with minimal repercussion
might be a cause for people thinking the law is just opression instead of a guideline that can be actually used
i mean like company espionage and similar threats than leaked user data…
i would even more say with anonymity, considering the chats are still private and the main use case for messanger apps is to communicate with people who know who you are
peek rage bait
where are the companys lobbying against this btw?? i mean it is their data they will be leaked aswell
lmao
i always wonder why people act like socialism/ communism or however one calls it should not work or be worse, while capitalism should work.
While one is working together while the other is everybody on their own.
like as if there would be any scenario really where working together would not be the most efficiant
(my comment is not about china)
I think maybe a good comparison is to written papers/ assignments. It can generate those just like it can generate code.
But it is not about the words themself, but about the content.
would you deploy this server?
i think the theory is that at some point it would be exactly the same
but i think this is not like backed up by anything really, and mostly a thought experiment.
managers and executives are workes too, and noone is saying they do no work. But their value is greatly inflated. Aswell as them taking all the credit for work of others. But in the end the worst are the owners and investors who litteraly just steal.
It annoys me so much that they have convinced anyone that this stuff is for protecting against piracy of something like that, while this is just another tool for them to force you into using their platform and ecosystem. It does nothing against piracy.
capitalism was kind of never democratic i think, considering so much is basically dictated by the people who “own” it, which feels more like a dictatorship/ feudalism