RobotToaster@mander.xyz to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 day agoUK cinemas look at banning Meta smart glasses over piracy fearswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up1149arrow-down12cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1147arrow-down1external-linkUK cinemas look at banning Meta smart glasses over piracy fearswww.theguardian.comRobotToaster@mander.xyz to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square19fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarecmnybo@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·11 hours agoYou don’t need cameras to generate subtitles.
minus-squareschipelblorp@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·11 hours agoTrue, but the display is there to show the subtitles, and it’s much better than looking down at a phone and distracting other audience members.
minus-squareWhyJiffie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·8 hours agoyou can have a smart glass without camera make subtitles
minus-squarejumping redditor [they/them]@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down2·7 hours agothe display is much more expensive than the camera so if there is any utility in there being a camer there is no reason to not have it
You don’t need cameras to generate subtitles.
True, but the display is there to show the subtitles, and it’s much better than looking down at a phone and distracting other audience members.
you can have a smart glass without camera make subtitles
the display is much more expensive than the camera so if there is any utility in there being a camer there is no reason to not have it