Arch is different…

  • Jiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    That is why I am using Tumbleweed, rolling release without the expectation of reading news before hitting zypper dup and stuff still being fine. The price for that is a few days of delay for testing, so that major stuff does not break.

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Manjaro has also shown how an Arch distro can achieve this as well, by releasing tested sets of updates slower.

      But OP is correct in that’s not the point of vanilla Arch and people who use vanilla should assume the risks.

      What’s annoying is people who use vanilla and tell everybody “oh don’t worry nothing ever breaks”. Something always breaks. You have a couple thousand packages installed on the average desktop system, dozens are updated to bleeding edge every day, something will break.

      Manjaro maintains a crowd-sourced list of the most egregious defects (+ their fixes) that crop up in popular packages, suffice to say it’s never empty.

      Many of them are not system-breaking and may not impact everyone, which is where I’m guessing the “nothing ever breaks” dissonance is coming from.

      • Jiral@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Fair enough. I am all for choosing a distro that aligns with the own reqirements. It is strange to use a misaligned distro and then complain about it.