• FishFace@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    Turns out the physical tasks that hadn’t been automated by 2015 were really hard and generally risky if you get them wrong. The risks of generating slop are minimal.

      • SorryQuick@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Look at google’s last robots, they have them tying plastic bags and screwing light bulbs.

        • FishFace@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          I think a lot of those robots are very expensive and liable to break the bones of onlookers when they go wrong…

          • SorryQuick@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            I don’t think they’re for sale, more of a research thing right now, but the point is that the technology is there, it just hasn’t reached the market yet.

            As for being liable to break the bones of onlookers… This is always the argument that comes up for some reason, same as self-driving cars. In reality, I’ve known my fair share of humans who are liable to break the bones of onlookers when things go wrong too.

            • FishFace@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Yes, those things will make it eventually too, I don’t mean to imply they won’t. Just emphasising that we can see the difficulty of the task still in those current efforts.