• some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    The “natural life” of all animals bred for meat ends with their slaughter, by definition. Otherwise they wouldn’t exist? Their purpose is not to die of old age, that itself would be a horribly cruel existence past the point when slaughter would normally occur.

    None of these creatures exist in nature. If they’re going to exist at all, why not give the best life and fulfillment of purpose if you can?

    • you have an incredibly bleak outlook on the “purpose” of a life. The slave is bred for the purpose of toiling for their master their entire life, does that justify anything? Hell the only reason the worker gets a wage is so they can work for the capitalist. The only reason people get maternity leave etc. is to breed more workers, that’s your purpose in life.

      Only the oppressor has a free choice in their lifes purpose. Well, somehow they always choose to oppress more so who knows. At least we have that old debate finally sorted.

      • some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 minutes ago

        Your examples are false equivalences from where I stand. Slavery, capitalism…these are human systems. Of course the people inside have their own goals and desires. Much of agriculture is wontonly bleak, but not by definition. People still exist without slavery, it is not the same for a meat chicken. They really shouldn’t exist, and ideally they wouldn’t, but they’re not going away anytime soon.