• SippyCup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I mean, evidence shows that having their ideas challenged online tends to entrench people in their ideas more so than it convinces them that they’re wrong.

    So, while I sympathize with your goals, I think your method is having the opposite effect of your intended outcome.

    I say this, knowing it’s true, and still doing the arguing online thing anyway.

    • Kindness is Punk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      It’s not about them it’s about the other people that might be influenced by their post.

      Online is never an A&B conversation, which is why I usually avoid direct confrontation and just provide well structured, clear information, because I don’t really care whether I can convince someone who has made up their mind.

      It’s about deconstructing the argument with clear digestible information for the dozens of lurkers.

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        37 minutes ago

        LOL as if. Literally I will see people with logical responses getting ripped apart because the person they are arguing with just sounds more right and or it fits what people wanted to hear in that specific echo chamber.

        Say something cause you want to say it, not cause you are giving yourself points on an invisible scoreboard for people that might not exist.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Evidence isn’t what bullies and bigots rely on. It’s their feelings of superiority and their justification of violence.

      hence why they will never argue with evidence or facts. They will just insult and harass and threaten.

      and if you use the evidence of their own words against them… well get ready to get reported to the mods.