• DdCno1@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s not like the Chinese are any better. I want both sides to lose.

    • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      They’re a little better. Many of their models are open-source and can be run offline.

      • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        there are no open source models. There are open weight models.

        No models make available the way in which they were produced, aka the source.

        • khorovodoved@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Everything is open-source if you know assembler

          Weights are basically algorithm. It is not even obfuscated. Companies successfully produce derivative works from them, what is the problem?

          One does not require git history for any Foss project, the exact way the code was produced IA not the requirement, it is the reproducibility that matters.