cannedtuna@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 hours agoElder scrollslemmy.worldimagemessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1476arrow-down14
arrow-up1472arrow-down1imageElder scrollslemmy.worldcannedtuna@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 hours agomessage-square47fedilink
minus-squareRooster326@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 hour agoWhat was wrong with the high contrast of 1988? It is at home in both light and dark mode
minus-squareOpenPassageways@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-21 hour agoMy only criticism is lack of affordance on the slider. Is the dark part the slider or the light part? Some of the newer ones have the little ridges for “traction”.
minus-squarebstix@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-21 hour agoThe issue with 1988 is that it isn’t intuitive what the background color is, and thus if the bar is up or down. The middle years are obvious because of the 3d effect. The last one is obvious because the background is the same for both the arrows and the bar.
We peaked in 2009
What was wrong with the high contrast of 1988?
It is at home in both light and dark mode
My only criticism is lack of affordance on the slider. Is the dark part the slider or the light part? Some of the newer ones have the little ridges for “traction”.
The issue with 1988 is that it isn’t intuitive what the background color is, and thus if the bar is up or down.
The middle years are obvious because of the 3d effect. The last one is obvious because the background is the same for both the arrows and the bar.