It’s easier to see what it is once you see the whole scenery. It’s a really clever framing, 10/10
Also colour saturation put to the max.
Not necessarily, just different lighting. OP looks like it was taken with low-angle full sunlight.
This all sounds a bit overly complex, have we 100% ruled out witchcraft?
Oh, so that’s a textured wall, and not the horizon/sky
Thank you for unfucking my brain.
I like this style, just don’t know what it’s called.
I can’t speak for the photography style, but that style of using walls of ice in a composition is called “impossible in 30 years”
Haha! Oh, now I’m sad. :(
Me too, buddy. Me too. :(
That’s very optimistic of you to think humans will be around to have names for such things in 30 years.
Ah, sorry. Is “anti-hot apartment tower made from solid aqua cola and lacking residents” better?
Checkers
A tetraptych or pseudo-tetraptych maybe? Closest concept I can think of.
Pete.
You just invented it. You get to name it. What would you like to call it?
A Croatian empanada!
It’s had a dedicated subreddit for like five years
Jefferson Starships!
NOT YOU
The upper right quadrant is a terracotta wall that goes right up to the water. Below that in the photo is the reflexion of the wall. The left half is just normal water with no reflexion.
It’s a really interesting composition. I’m not a fan of these kinds of things being called “unaltered”/“unedited”, because after a bit of searching I can’t find any evidence of that. But it certainly is not a composite.
If it’s shot on film, it’s possible the saturation is natural, but I can’t find metadata anywhere.
was anyone else able to see the pic for what it is and then left confused looking for why it’s supposed to be confusing
How???
The bottom right is a reflection on the water of the wall at the top right.
You must bend the spoon.
Man-made structure in the top right
Aaaaaaah ok
Oh no.
Somebody please explain
unaltered
🤔🤥
Yep. It’s literally cropped from the original and impossible to argue it’s unaltered
