Space Facts@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-222 hours agoWhat's funny here?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1592arrow-down115
arrow-up1577arrow-down1imageWhat's funny here?lemmy.worldSpace Facts@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-222 hours agomessage-square29fedilink
minus-squaresp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 hour ago… that would substantially change the meaning, away from what the OP themself indicated they meant to convey. That also would not be a usage of the Oxford comma, as that comma would be doing a different grammatical job than deliniating items in a list. It would be deliniating a vocative phrase. Yes, it does… make it into a workable sentence … but it would not be an Oxford comma.
minus-squarebaines@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·59 minutes agosure but it works for the sake of the oxford comma ‘joke’ bit of a dead horse but people love it
minus-squaresp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·32 minutes agoI genuienly do not understand what you mean.
… that would substantially change the meaning, away from what the OP themself indicated they meant to convey.
That also would not be a usage of the Oxford comma, as that comma would be doing a different grammatical job than deliniating items in a list.
It would be deliniating a vocative phrase.
Yes, it does… make it into a workable sentence … but it would not be an Oxford comma.
sure but it works for the sake of the oxford comma ‘joke’
bit of a dead horse but people love it
I genuienly do not understand what you mean.