• null@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Based, but also selfish as fuck with all their coworkers out of work.

    • BillCheddar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      There were all of 20 people working. That would put the total employee numbers at what, 60-100 people max?

      Relative to a second shot across the bow of the Epstein Class?

      Priceless. Literally priceless. I feel for the 100 folks who have to find somewhere else to be exploited, but it’s not a difficult trade to accept.

      • null@lemmy.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Damn, dawg. That’s a pretty damning justification for shoving great personal sacrifice onto others. That’s the kind of thinking the Epstein class employs every day.

      • null@lemmy.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        You don’t know what the worker was being paid. You don’t know what the other workers were being paid. Being in CA it was a minimum of ~$17/hr.

          • null@lemmy.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            42 minutes ago

            There are $1500/m apartments on Zillow in that area. Less than that if you commute. Minimum wage covers that and more without even having a roommate.

            Should they be paid more? Yes. They probably are. But this guy decided to put his coworkers at risk of homelessness which is the point I’m arguing.