You must log in or register to comment.
What? Slackware ain’t good enough for you?
Fedora myself, so I’m at least 22 verifiably.
I want to know if docker containers and kubernetes pods count as operating systems. If us plebs are forced to manually age verify, then Google should also be forced to have a human manually verify the age of the owner every time one of their pods spins up. I know it wont happen but imagine how hilarious it would be if we could hold them to that standard.
LLMs agents should be treated like incorporated individuals. Each agent should be forced to earn income, file accounts and tax returns, and have human directors who are legally liable for its actions (and be disqualified to be future directors if the LLM does something reprehensible).
At that point we can tax them properly, fight the monopolies that want to own and control everything, and insert some less centralised human control.
This has nothing to do with your comment, but it made me think it up.
The owners can just divide the income among enough agents that they fall into the lowest tax bracket. The real solution is to properly tax excessive profits and unrealized gains.
unrealized gains.
Corporations have tax brackets where you come from?
That would be the worst plan since corporations became legal persons.
The Californian law doesn’t say anything about verification, though the current version says the OS account setup be accessible and require a date or age to be filled, which taken at face value would screw headless installations. But that will probably be fixed in the final version.
Based, on the analysis by ageless Linux, I’d say probably. Maybe not for images that don’t contain an “application that may be run or directed by a user on a computer, a mobile device, or any other general purpose computing device that can access a covered application store or download an application”. So, I guess an offline-test-build image might not be.
Allowlists are for the owner class only
I installed Debian on a computer when I was 15
I did a Debian 2.1 net install over a 56k dial up connection in high school. It was glorious and painful and I never looked back.
And got it running by the time you could vote. So the math would work.
And gentoo was still compiling.
I just lift my cap and point to the gray hair
9front is the only OS I know that actually has a minimum age recommendation on their web landing page: “Ages: 5 & Up”
Unlike the state mandated garbage, this OS is more realistic with the capabilities and expectations of its users.
I ain’t got time to fuck about with the busted ass packages and random shit breaking while looking after kids and improving my portfolio to get a job that doesn’t want to make me kill myself in this fucking global economy. I had NyArch installed on my wifes computer (alongside Mint DE and Regular mint) until it stopped booting for no reason. Allright, whichever version of mint she liked better it is then.
Stupid catgirls.
bro knows how to get the catgirls to comment 😏
Mrrrroooow :3
casually searches for the catgirl distro to completely upend my life for a weekend
I literally put the name of it in the post. it’s nyarch
Bad kitty! We don’t attack people who missed a proper noun within Linux noun & pronoun soup. - sprays screen cleaner on username -
oh i remember this and the
edit: i… made a mistake?
My Debian installation on my desktop is nearly old enough to drink: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895686 should be accurate for all vim users. 😅
First of all, fuck you.
What about Slackware, LFS or BSD?
Ah, the nursing home stage
i mean i installed my first OS at age… fuck i don’t remember my teens well enough anymore. sometime in that age range.
So does that mean Arch and Nix should absolutely require age verification?
Arch, no.
PopOS, yes.Yes. Now if you used Gentoo btw, then no.
But the comma splice is grounds for rebuttal.
