Playing with mpv.

They appear mostly on curvatures when the screen is “moving” vertically.

  • nywuma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    18 hours ago

    It isn’t necessarily bad, it’s just an old way to handle low bandwidth. It sucks when video editing, but aside from when we see them when pausing (like your images), it’s very rare we actually notice (from personal experience, at least).

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It can be noticeable during regular playback on a modern display, under the right conditions. Anime is one of those due to the high contrast in the picture.

      It was also weird to pause an interlaced video on VHS and watch it alternate between frames. Any objects in motion would jump back and forth.

    • emotional_soup_88@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Ah, I see. I just read the Wikipedia entry on interlaced video and learned that it’s called “combing”.

      I was actually just continuously taking a lot of images until the combing was visible. Didn’t pause. ^^

      Hail mpv. It does an AMAZING job at deinterlacing, as an other commenter just taught me. No more combing. :)

      • >/dev/null@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Ahh to be young(er), lots of old TV and media was in ntsc and pal format for broadcast, so it’s interlaced cause bandwidth and storage media cost (you only need to refresh half the crt each pass). There used to be so many threads on doom 9 on the best pipeline for virtualdub(mod) to deintelace and make progressive encodes to divx etc

        • homes@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Actually, interlaced video in NTSC signal was because the NTSC signal was what we used on old school televisions. An old school televisions used an interlaced scan to display the images. Displayed half the image in one scan and then another display the other one and it displayed both of them so fast it appeared to be one image. That’s why TV screens flicker.

            • homes@piefed.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              16 hours ago

              Not exactly. It’s true that interlaced signals are good at low bandwidth, but the televisions themselves had an interlaced scan picture, so that’s the main reason why NTSC is broadcast interlaced. For the televisions themselves. When we moved away from analog video to digital video, even television signals in the United States began to transition to a progressive scan, especially when we moved to HD and HDTVs