• CoyoteFacts@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I don’t think it’s that unwarranted to calculate that there’s a certain amount of money that you could realistically spend in a lifetime, and anything after that might as well be passed on to taxes and other charities/community initiatives to help everyone else.

    It’s probably not something us common folk think about, but I’m certain that these people have thought about it at least once before, and their decision to keep the money for themselves is what makes them evil. There are no good billionaires because to reach that level you need to have made that decision long ago; the “good billionaires” are still millionaires.

    • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 hours ago

      That’s exactly the point I think anyone reasonable would make.

      It’s not necessarily how they got the money, it’s that they keep it. If I won the lottery, and got a multi-billion dollar payout, I could wire most of that money to a DAF, tell it to distribute the money to 200 different charities I like, and it could be done within the week.

      Keeping that much money is a choice. Continuing to spend it all on lavish expenses while the poor suffer is a personal choice, not one they’re forced to bear the consequences of due to their fame.