• merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Red light cameras may not be effective at making streets safer. But, they’re nearly 100% effective at making people who run red lights pay fines. The first one would be amazing, but I’m happy to settle for the second one.

      • dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        You sound like someone who can likes rich people getting away with just paying fines for being rich assholes

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          And you sound like someone who wants to be able to run red lights without consequences.

          • dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            No, I just want traffic lights enforced without being in a surveilance state, but the better solution is just to make more streets illegal to have cars instead of adding lights, and add bus routes instead

            But people will be lazy and say eh, surveilance state is good enough for me since Im not affected! More buses. Fewer cars. Fewer lights necessary and fewer surveliance cameras necessary.

        • urandom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 hours ago

          The problem is not the cameras then, but the fines. Should be proportional to net worth

          • dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            we both know thatll never happen in america, and until then its a law for poors only, as designed. Its continued existence only affects poor people

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Cameras specifically to catch people running red-lights will only take a photo when a car crosses a red light rather than run continuously.

      They’ll only have you “under surveillance” if and when you’re breaking the law by running a red light.

      So if you’re so worried about “surveillance” from those cameras, don’t run red-lights.

      • deathbird@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 hours ago

        There are other, newer cameras like those from Flock that run and check continuously. I prefer the old-school ones you’re talking about.