SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com to memes@lemmy.world · 2 days agoGuess it was truelemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1581arrow-down138file-text
arrow-up1543arrow-down1imageGuess it was truelemmy.dbzer0.comSnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com to memes@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square43fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarerenegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 days agoAssuming the baby is a spherical point mass in a vacuum is so 101.
minus-squarebleistift2@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days ago spherical point That’s a new kind of math, definitely not 101.
minus-squarewischi@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-22 days agoSphere with radius zero. Problem solved 🤣
minus-squareCannonFodder@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoBut then quantum mechanics are significant, and you have black hole.
minus-squarewischi@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoBlack holes are GR and it wouldn’t make the calculations much different. Take the moon for example, the orbit would be exactly the same no matter if earth is a rocky planet, a black hole or a point mass.
minus-squareCannonFodder@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·21 hours agoYeah, but how are you gonna throw a black hole baby?
minus-squarerenegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agodeleted by creator
Assuming the baby is a spherical point mass in a vacuum is so 101.
That’s a new kind of math, definitely not 101.
Sphere with radius zero. Problem solved 🤣
But then quantum mechanics are significant, and you have black hole.
Black holes are GR and it wouldn’t make the calculations much different. Take the moon for example, the orbit would be exactly the same no matter if earth is a rocky planet, a black hole or a point mass.
Yeah, but how are you gonna throw a black hole baby?
deleted by creator