• ragas@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    By not using GrapheneOS obviously.

    Also GrapheneOS is about security not about privacy or freedom. So GrapheneOS is just not really part of the discussion here.

    • Pazuzu@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You’re not disproving my point that there is no feasible way for me as a consumer to have a functional device without begrudgingly supporting either apple or android in their walled garden bullshit. No amount of “voting with my wallet” will fix this without a proper alternative

      • ragas@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It kinda depends on what you define as “functional” though. Because depending on that it is definitely feasible to vote with your wallet.

        In my case for example, I use a fairphone with lineageos and microg. This means I have to live with some minor inconveniences around banking and such. But, for me, this is a functional device and I can do everything I want to do with it.

    • SuperDuperKitten@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Which is buying a new/used Google Pixel which is still supporting Google. Even if we got it second-hand, the development for GrapheneOS still depends on Pixel phone device and making it support the newer model which is still in a way, support Google as you still getting their product to then jailbreak it.