Yes, because men do dumber stunts, not drive worse when they’re trying. The stats don’t lie.
I’m not aiming to justify bigotry, but to point at the OBVIOUSNESS of someone looking at drivers who are performing poorly. That will statistically lean towards more women deivers. Insurance only looks at what they have to pay out on. Like some dumbass taking a corner too fast and wrecking multiple vehicles is going to more likely be a guy than a woman, but someone blowing a stopsign or screwing up their lane command because they were distracted by something else is more likely a woman.
I’m sorry reality doesn’t agree with you, but it also doesn’t agree with your moronic assumptions in what I think, either.
No, it’s literally not when most guys are not doing “dumb stunts” most of the time.
It’s the commonality of banal events vs the expense of the catastrophic events. You are being too stupid to differentiate these two VERY different things.
I’d rather be the dumbeat man on Earth than a mouth breathing, misogynistic incel. You act like you have been quoting statistics but haven’t provided a single source. You keep moving the goal posts and never backing your argument up.
Yes, because men do dumber stunts, not drive worse when they’re trying. The stats don’t lie.
I’m not aiming to justify bigotry, but to point at the OBVIOUSNESS of someone looking at drivers who are performing poorly. That will statistically lean towards more women deivers. Insurance only looks at what they have to pay out on. Like some dumbass taking a corner too fast and wrecking multiple vehicles is going to more likely be a guy than a woman, but someone blowing a stopsign or screwing up their lane command because they were distracted by something else is more likely a woman.
I’m sorry reality doesn’t agree with you, but it also doesn’t agree with your moronic assumptions in what I think, either.
Doing “dumb stunts” is literally driving worse when its on a public road shared with other drivers.
No, it’s literally not when most guys are not doing “dumb stunts” most of the time.
It’s the commonality of banal events vs the expense of the catastrophic events. You are being too stupid to differentiate these two VERY different things.
I’d rather be the dumbeat man on Earth than a mouth breathing, misogynistic incel. You act like you have been quoting statistics but haven’t provided a single source. You keep moving the goal posts and never backing your argument up.