• msage@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    It would be way more impressive if it didn’t cost entire nations GDP and fresh water usage to implement.

    If you throw large enough sum of money on many problems, they will be solved. Yet most AI haven’t solved much, they just brute-force things.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m not sure what you mean by brute force… they are FAR more efficient than brute forcing things.

      I think people vastly underestimate the computational complexity of brute forcing a solution in reality.

        • Pennomi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Is that true though? Nobody has shown a more efficient way to solve these problems. And if they did, everybody would immediately start using that technique.

          I’m confident that a more efficient way exists, but it has not yet been discovered. Hard to convince people to do a thing that nobody has invented yet.

          • msage@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            It’s not hard to say ‘this isn’t production ready, we need to approach it from a different angle’.

            It’s hard to make it happen, I get it, it’s just ridiculous how money focused our society is. No problem will be solved unless it makes the rich richer.