• aidan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    No you’re not. That’s just fundamentally untrue. You’re accepting their beliefs if you repeat after them.

      • aidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Then you accept the beliefs of Nazis by your definition. After all, you haven’t killed any yet.

        • irmoz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          That’s not my definition. That’s you trying to deflect.

          No, i neither argue with them of GTFO, like I said.

          • aidan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I do argue with Nazis. Why do you continue to let them exist.

            That’s you trying to deflect.

            That’s me saying you have a different definition to accept from me. I consider accepting a belief to be believing the belief is acceptable and sane. I do not accept nazism.

            • irmoz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              Why are you arguing with me, then, when all I said was that you shouldn’t accept being in the presence of their beliefs? Based on your most recent comments you seem to agree… so what are we doing here? And why are you trying to catch me in some gotcha based on a statement I never made?

              And no, accepting a belief means not challenging it, implicitly treating it as normal.

              • aidan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                Why are you arguing with me, then, when all I said was that you shouldn’t accept being in the presence of their beliefs?

                Okay, so you agree you can accept a person as a human and a friend without accepting their beliefs? Because that’s what I’m saying

                And no, accepting a belief means not challenging it, implicitly treating it as normal.

                I wouldn’t really agree with that only because its just not your job. You don’t have a responsibility with burdening yourself with constantly correcting others.

                • irmoz@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 hours ago

                  Okay, so you agree you can accept a person as a human and a friend without accepting their beliefs?

                  Misleading question. If their “differing belief” is that God created the Earth, or that crystals have healing magic, then whatever. They can be kooky if they want. If their “differing belief” is that only whites deserve to live, they can get fucked.

                  I wouldn’t really agree with that only because its just not your job. You don’t have a responsibility with burdening yourself with constantly correcting others.

                  What a deliciously convenient excuse for not challenging your nazi friends. “It’s not my job!!”

                  It’s also “not your job” to queue properly, to put shopping trolleys back in the corral, or to obey traffic laws. You do it anyway, though, because it is the right thing to do. I don’t have to be employed for every little thing i do.

                  But hey, let’s try your logic: it is not my job to ensure that every little racist feels accepted and understood. It’s not my responsibility to coddle Nazis.