• rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am talking about people not companies.

    Right, but your statements are entirely in response to what you believe Epic’s PR statements are saying. Earlier you stated:

    The point remains Epic lies saying they “help devs” Valve never claims anything.

    This is what you said. You are assuming that Epic has made claims that it helps individual developers (people whose job is to develop games). I don’t think this is accurate: I believe that the intent behind Epic’s statements is that it aims to help “Game Development Companies.”

    Either way, it doesn’t really matter. Epic, Valve, whomever: they’re companies. Loyalty to them is pathetic.

    • Tak@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s not what I am meaning, sorry.

      I am meaning that Epic talks about a better cut for developers when really it’s a better cut for publishers. If Epic said they give a bigger cut to corporate entities I honestly don’t give a single flying fuck. Pay 50% to the store, I don’t care about your capitalist entities.

      I’m not arguing loyalty for Valve just that Valve doesn’t pretend they’re helping the poor little developers with their bullshit to fuck over end users.

      Also.

      I don’t think this is accurate: I believe that the intent behind Epic’s statements is that it aims to help “Game Development Companies.”

      This is completely propaganda in my opinion. Epic can afford to use two more words instead of just calling them developers and being entirely vague unless they enjoy the misleading nature of calling them developers. Developers are people full stop.

      • rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Valve doesn’t pretend they’re helping the poor little developers with their bullshit to fuck over end users.

        I mean, they have done this. Back when they initiated their marketplace and created paid mods for Skyrim, they basically touted it as a way of allowing artists and content designers to be paid for their work. Valve took almost all the profit from these initiatives. Like, by far almost every single dime. You’re just not aware of it because you don’t want to be, or haven’t been around long enough to see Valve show it’s colors as the sleazy corporation it always was.

        Epic can afford to use two more words instead of just calling them developers

        Okay, but…what about smaller studios that don’t have established publishers? Epic Games does offer a developer portal and dev tools for studios to leverage, including self-publishing. It is entirely possible to both be developer AND publisher. Also, Tim Sweeney has said that Epic would gladly stop its exclusivity deals should Valve commit to matching their 88/12 profit splitting: https://www.gamespot.com/articles/epic-boss-says-exclusives-policy-will-change-if-st/1100-6466479/

        Quote from Sweeney: “If Steam committed to a permanent 88% revenue share for all developers and publishers without major strings attached, Epic would hastily organize a retreat from exclusives (while honoring our partner commitments) and consider putting our own games on Steam” - note that they included in their verbiage both terms, which as you’ll notice is not the same as just saying “developers.” They do draw attention to the fact that publishers are among their most prominent business partners.

        Look, I’m not saying you can’t criticize Epic. Their launcher is terrible. But if you’re going to criticize something, do it honestly and while at least moderately well informed.

        • Tak@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You really love whataboutisms and it’s clear you’re just going to whatabout again and again and again but I’ll indulge you.

          Cite how Valve said that they’re helping poor little developers with Skyrim mods. Like I remember the whole thing but I don’t remember the cut valve was taking and how much was bethesda who tried to revive that shit with FO4

          Okay, but…what about smaller studios that don’t have established publishers?

          I’ve already said I encourage them to take the deal but that doesn’t mean Epic focuses on giving small studios where Devs get rewarded for the exclusivity and you know it. Most of their exclusivity deals will be giving mostly all of the money to massive corporations and the developers will see none of it.

          Quote Sweeney all you want but he is not someone I believe at their word and Steam isn’t losing money so I don’t have to worry about losing my games where if EGS shutters I do.

          Look, I’m not saying you can’t criticize Epic.

          Yes you are. Read your previous comments. You immediately got defensive and jumped to “but what about Steam” and have been actively boot licking for Epic.

          • rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They aren’t whataboutisms because they’re explicitly about the topic of discussion. They’re evidence against your core argument because your core argument is about a particular conclusion you’ve drawn and the basis on which you’ve drawn that. As such, your usage of the term is incorrect.

            Cite how Valve said that they’re helping poor little developers with Skyrim mods. Like I remember the whole thing but I don’t remember the cut valve was taking and how much was bethesda who tried to revive that shit with FO4

            Sure. I’ll provide article links. Just like you did…oh wait.

            https://www.gameskinny.com/news/pay-for-skyrim-mods-revenue-for-valve-and-creators-frustrates-pc-gamers/ https://www.wired.com/2015/04/steam-skyrim-paid-mods/

            Relevant part: “By paying for mods and supporting the people that made them, you enable those artists and creators to continue working on their mods and inspire new modders to try their hand in creating new, higher quality items and experiences.” - Valve frames their initiative as providing a way for gamers (and it’s implied, themselves) to help modders. Takes almost all the money. Classic Valve.

            Most of their exclusivity deals will be giving mostly all of the money to massive corporations and the developers will see none of it.

            I think the crux of this is that you are reading their advertisement (which is what it is) as them saying “literally every single developer who works with us in any capacity will directly benefit from doing so.” This is not what they are saying. They are advertising their platform, specifically towards smaller developers who are going to try and self-publish. They aren’t saying they’re going to benefit everyone equally. It’s a business. If you have a large studio that is attached to a publisher, and that publisher goes with Epic, yeah, they probably aren’t going to see any extra money from that. But they weren’t going to see any money from that anyway, regardless if their game launches on EGS or Steam. But a smaller developer or indy development studio might benefit from developing their game with Epic’s tools and might benefit from the greater split of revenue they get from the EGS. In that case, some developers might materially benefit from that. Others might not. But the point isn’t that Epic promises to help each and every developer. They’re framing themselves as a better platform for smaller, independent developers to launch on. That’s the purpose of those statements. This is fairly obvious purely by way of understanding the context in which those statements are made. You haven’t really argued that no one benefits in any way from contracting with Epic. You’ve only argued that there are some people who wouldn’t. But these are not conceptually equivalent.

            Quote Sweeney all you want but he is not someone I believe at their word

            Okay, cool. You can think he’s lying all you want. I would imagine that it makes your position a lot easier to maintain if you refuse to believe new information presented to you that directly undermines your argument.

            Yes you are.

            No, I’m not. You can criticize it for a lot of things. Their launcher is really bad compared to Steam’s. EGS has dogshit account security. The EGS fails to account for regional pricing, so it kinda sucks as a functional online store. The lack of community features also hinders user feedback to developers and the financial safety net their contracts create also kind of insulates developers from the need for bugfixes and feature updates, which means that the games on their platform are just generally shittier than they might otherwise be if released on something like Steam. These are all functional criticisms. As far as a business goes, they’re not any worse or better than Valve. They’re both just businesses and they both functionally operating in order to maximize profit. Your criticisms of Epic as a business are based almost entirely in a sentiment spoonfed to you by capital G Gamers on the internet. You hate Epic and love Valve. Not because of anything they’ve actually done that hurts you in a meaningful way. But because others hated it and you lack the mental or emotional capacity to actually think for yourself.

            Just tragic.

            Go outside. Touch some grass. Read a book. Talk to people with real problems.