Your comment is well written but not grammatically correct, since your second sentence is a fragment, and the pronoun “which” has no antecedent.
ChatGPT writes like a corporation. It’s unmistakable. I read about a book a day, and this idea that I’m going to mistake good writing for AI slop is insane. AI cannot write creatively. It follows rigid ugly patterns by design.
I politely disagree. Given the metric fuckton of books it ingested in training, I find it hard to believe that it cannot produce something “in the style of” that would pass most cursory examinations.
As for my grammar, I believe that sentence fragments are an acceptable stylistic device when for creating emphasis, at least in more informal settings. I would say comment sections qualify, wouldn’t you agree?
Your comment is well written but not grammatically correct, since your second sentence is a fragment, and the pronoun “which” has no antecedent.
ChatGPT writes like a corporation. It’s unmistakable. I read about a book a day, and this idea that I’m going to mistake good writing for AI slop is insane. AI cannot write creatively. It follows rigid ugly patterns by design.
I politely disagree. Given the metric fuckton of books it ingested in training, I find it hard to believe that it cannot produce something “in the style of” that would pass most cursory examinations.
As for my grammar, I believe that sentence fragments are an acceptable stylistic device when for creating emphasis, at least in more informal settings. I would say comment sections qualify, wouldn’t you agree?