• Umbrias@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is remarkably aggressive and assumptive. It also addresses none of my beliefs substantively so not much to really chew on there.

    You let me know if you ever want to chat about the issue, but right now it looks like you just want to vent. Feel free to do that but I’m not going to just be an object of your anger.

      • taanegl@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You also didn’t get the gist =) Because you didn’t want to. Ah well. Better luck next time.

    • taanegl@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Actually, I hid all that in the goop - but it went passed ya because you didn’t want to read with your minds eye. You also weren’t showing any sympathy, but false sympathy, because you just wanted to dismiss the person and not their concern. This is called an “as hominem”. You argue the person rather than the points, and they did substantially tell you that it’s a matter of being able to be paid for your labours.

      A little hint: copyright is there to protect creators from over reach, which should be fairly obvious. Both mass consolidation of intellectual property and fuzzing of copyright through AI is also abuse of the very founding principles of copyright.

      But sometimes people just want to dismiss, it becomes easier if someone is upset, cus then your can take the high road about stuff and people will be happy with it…

      Ok, byyyyye~ _