Maybe it is

  • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Tbh, copilot was probably the worst AI coding experience I’ve had. It actually made me less productive and made me question my competency as a programmer at the same time. Straight up did not have a good time. Use Cody or GPT-4 instead.

    • starman@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is designed for other purposes than GPT models. Next time try to use copilot as autocompletion, not to generate new code. It’s excellent in that.

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s how I was using it; I ended up spending as much time as I was saving going around and cleaning up after it and/or second guessing myself. Basically, because it only operates in the context of the file you’re working in, it will suggest garbage half the time if you have to work with resources from other files.

        • starman@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          From the docs:

          GitHub Copilot analyzes the context in the file you are editing, as well as related files

          Tho, I don’t know if it allways been that way, maybe they added bigger context later

    • CaptKoala@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But the propaganda from GitHub said it was making devs 80%+/- more productive!

      How could this have happened? /s