• Kellamity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    I suppose I’d call myself more curious than sceptical - I could look shit up and I can’t be bothered - but how do you define when humans became humans? I imagine its an estimate based from anthropological and fossil records and stuff

    • Taako_Tuesday@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      They’re just taking an educated guess. Based on fossil records we’ve estimated that homo sapiens sapiens emerged about 200k-300k years ago. I’m not sure if they assumed a middle ground estimate of 250k years here, but it was probably something like that. If we’re measuring by years, the margin of error is huge, but when we’re estimating the total number of people, it doesn’t matter that much, because there were so few of us for so long.

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Based on fossil records we’ve estimated that homo sapiens sapiens emerged about 200k-300k years ago.

        All of the estimates of when modern humans “emerged” (originally called the “Out of Africa” or “Mitochondrial Eve” hypothesis) are/were based on population analyses of samples of modern DNA (mitochondrial or otherwise) and are/were presented as being in opposition to conclusions based on the fossil record. The original such estimate was 100,000 years ago subsequently revised to 200,000 years ago (both in the mid-1980s) and since then these estimates have been all over the place, ranging from 50,000 years ago to 500,000 years ago. The fossil record shows no significant changes even within this wide time range: bipedality appears in the fossil record for our lineage around 5 million years ago, while our brains enlarged from chimpanzee size to modern human size between 2 million and 1 million years ago.

    • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      You could also argue its a moot point in the wider image - pop numbers at the time you discuss would be mean few grains difference at most.