• Kennystillalive@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Are you suppossed to be smart to solve one? I thought you just look it up once and than know how to do it.

    • Carnelian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 days ago

      In the context of speed cubing, to be honest it’s more like a roguelike videogame at this point than anything. If you think of the scramble as a new map, you basically use your game knowledge to put the cube in a known state that you can then progress quickly with known algorithms.

      Even the most procedural way of solving the cube, the beginner’s method, has a ton of points where you need to carefully observe the cube and make some intuitive adjustments. And then as you progress into different methods the “game” really opens up to you.

      There was a great video a few years ago, This one right here, where they gave 5 cubers of differing skill levels the exact same scramble and had them solve it and talk through their process. Each took a totally different path based on their knowledge of cubing strategy

      But yeah you don’t need to be a genius or anything to start “playing” the “game”.

      Actually solving the actual puzzle with no guide would be a totally different beast. They sell 2x2 cubes actually, which I would recommend to anyone wanting to go in blind. They’re surprisingly devious, and from my experience beginners actually get hooked right away vs with the 3x3 cubes where they give up after like ten seconds lol

    • khannie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      The algorithms are well known and documented at this stage. Before that, figuring it out was devilishly hard.

      • thegr8goldfish@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        I managed to solve it in the early 2000s with nothing other than a lot of time. I just messed with it whenever I was not typing at a customer service job. Definitely no genius required. Just persistance.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      You don’t have to be smart, but you need a willingness to learn something that isn’t terribly important.

      So, you know, consider that.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      A friend taught me to solve them via procedures, and I memorized like six different patterns. I can get very stuck if the top edges don’t line up the way I know how to fix them. It’s mostly muscle memory and practice, but it takes me at best 5 minutes to solve a cube.

      So no, you don’t have to be smart.

  • Carvex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m not sure Tom Hanks’ character was thinking about Rubik’s cubes while he was trying to pee out that kidney stone.

  • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    No joke this is how I got my girlfriend of 5 years, had on my tinder bio:

    i can solve a rubiks cube in under 60 seconds

    if for some reason you haven’t already swiped right here’s some other stuff

    • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It does work sometimes.

      I happened to get a like on Feeld from someone who’s bio says “I have a Ph.D, meaning I have lots of knowledge about an incredibly specific thing”. I’m polysatured at the moment (meaning my poly relationships are full and I can’t really take on another one), but I still kinda want to ask her out and talk about her thesis over dinner.