• cub Gucci@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    It depends. Got respect for my previous employer who rejected a hefty deal with Big Tobacco company on the basis it being harmful to humanity

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    How else would they motivate me?

    Because employment is not about me motivating myself.

    They want to get my work, they have to provide motivation.

  • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    129
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ironically if you really want employees to be motivated by more than money, you need to pay even more.

    Only people who don’t worry about money can afford to be motivated by other things.

    • Nobody is motivated by money.

      The poor are motivated to be able to afford food they need money for this they are motivated by the need to eat money is simply a means to an ends.

      The middle class are motivated by comfort and ironically will work very hard to achieve this. Once again money is the means to this ends.

      The rich are motivated by power and influence and will do anything to achieve this. Again money is the means not the ends.

      To not be motivated by money one must become the Buddha. To not want money one must want for nothing that money can purchase but by its very definition it can purchase anything. So one must want for nothing and thus have achieved nirvana. I doubt someone who has achieved nirvana would find themselves working a dead end job.

      • Impractical_Island@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        40 minutes ago

        A Buddha is the correct way to say that, and you don’t just throw away all desires, permenantly. Desires still come, but is in unentangling yourself from your karmic fetters that allows one to be unattached from their desires. To want nothing is to be dead. Buddhas still have wants. Negative thoughts come, but they go just as quickly, and in developing one’s inner world, their unconscious mind catches most unuseful percolations to the surface.

        There is a story about Mara, which is kinda, sorta “the Buddhist devil” in a trickster sort of way, yet is also an enlightened being, who once possessed a child and threw a rock at an arhant’s head while he was walking in jhana meditation behind the Buddha. The rock hit his head and drew blood, and from the outsider’s perspective, it looks as if the arhant is unphased, but there was a microsecond of the feeling and the cascade of processes within him.

        The thing is, enlightenment involves, in modern terms, developing one’s prefrontal cortex to predict the animal part of the brain and cut it off at the pass, so to speak. So, even before the rock finished impacting him, the arhant would have unconsciously quieted the parts of him that are inclined to react.

        Also, you don’t “achieve” Nirvana, as that implies personally accomplishing some feat, when it is really a process akin to entering a stream and being carried to a place you see what you need to see to understand the entanglement process of Karma.

        Likewise, someone who has been awakened to the emptiness inside them would absolutely work a dead-end job if they knew there was merit to it. A Buddha is a perfect spy, for instance, for they would be able to do the highest or lowest job or task required of them to complete their mission, peacefully and skillfully.

        This is my poem, a lipogram using only A and E vowels, entitled Nervana:

  • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Is there a word for memes that totally lack the context of their original images to the point of being opposite the intention of the creator?

    Because I think the next scene is Ledger’s Joker setting that pile of money on fire.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 day ago

    But he burned it in the next part of the scene so this doesn’t make sense. Should have gone with Huell Babineaux.

      • DrakeAlbrecht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s not about the money, it’s about sending a message that will cost us at least five hundred tokens and probably come back with shit code that doesn’t even compile.

    • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      And they’d probably have objectively more money if their employees got paid more, as the pie would grow. But they care more about having the biggest slice, even if that decrease the total amount, so it really is about sending a message for them.

  • DrakeAlbrecht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 day ago

    Never trust anyone who tells you he runs his company like a family. That just means he’s run out of actual family members to exploit.

  • wuffah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s not about the money, it’s about sending a message… that shareholder value will always increase to perpetually borrow against tax free!

  • pageflight@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Sounds just like a previous CEO always talking about how “this will make us all filthy rich” while issuing layoffs and demanding nights/weekends. Should’ve left sooner.